Mt St Helens 30 Years Later - Volcanic Eruption that Changed the Landscape and Questioned Evolution
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010
by Julian Price
http://www.uk-freelance-content-writer.co.uk/
It is exactly 30 years since the roof blew off Mount St Helens, killing 57 people in the deadliest volcanic eruption in American history. May 18 th 1980 was also the day that evolutionary scientists were left with a little egg on their faces.
Scientists had long held the belief that the kind of massive and catastrophic landscape transformation that happened in such a short time during the eruption of Mount St Helens was only possible over a period of millions of years.
Creationists claim that if Mount St Helens eruption could completely alter vast areas of landscape in such a short space of time that the Biblical events of Noah's worldwide catastrophic flood (and all its likely volcanic activity) could indeed change the face of the planet in a short time also.
This debate still rages and still leaves evolutionists with a hole in their theory.
This Article has been viewed 972 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (2 total)Debate? What debate? What are you talking about millions for? The earth is 4.6 billion years old (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%). I agree that this particular feature could have been created suddenly - there is examples of catastrophic geology. However, look at radioactive dating, meteorites and evolution. I beg you to look at it.Oh and please stop saying creation science (its creation pseudo-science at best) and calling them scientists. It's insulting to real science and scientists.Hi Connor, Thanks for the comment. I will return with a more in depth reply when I get a moment..snowed under at the moment. However, debate usually arises when there are differences of opinion and whether evolutionists like it or not there are millions of people who passionately believe that evolution isn't true(regardless of how right or wrong they may be), just as passionately as evolutionists believe that it is....debate is born! Thanks again, will add more when i can.I see where you are coming from. Debate in the context you are thinking of yes. I am thinking about debate in scientific terms - science is not a matter of opinion but facts. Yes there is a difference of opinion but not of fact.
Very informative, just a bit short on the info.Hi Jack, thanks for chipping in. This was only intended as a bit of newsflash but there is plenty of info out there to support both "theories" of evolution and creation.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.

